The Passive Soldier | Arab Jerusalem

On my morning spring tour, I march after a long absence as a victorious soldier before he became unknown. A free-spirited Spring Shahroura said: “We missed you, my friend. We whispered.. Then his soul mate smiled in agreement.. There is no jealousy among the birds and there is no there is no competition for friendliness, for the hearts of wild beasts welcome much love that only those who inhabit a corner of the heart know.. I walk celebrating the eyes of the spring entities. Welcome my oppa to my morning visit after my absence.. Sanabel bows her head in greeting and bows to her neighbors that we miss your eyes.. Roses here and there in the sweet plants and even in the thorns, in the trees whose sleeves are open, or those who bear their small fruits in front of them.. they are all resuscitated Her perfume for me.. She says to me: I went down quietly and I was perfumed.. Me, I walk as usual.. However, a love like this distracts me and brings me closer.. It scatters me and crashes me.. It revitalizes me with love and then kills me.. In this green passage there is sedition and the reddish timidity twists the road, and I am between the fields of wheat I walk like a victorious soldier..Not for nothing but because the spring has been able to offer and everyone here is in goodness and grace..Everyone here deep in this land knows me for when I cross I give them a piece of my abundance..I walk between fertility and the colors of birth here in the irrigated wheat fields. I walk a great soldier known by the birds, the flowers, the wheat and the beans, and under the fall of his steps, the water flows in this valley. A stream and Shahrour sings to his princess words that speak of Omar, whose feathers are not enough to count the beats of happiness in his heart.. I am a victorious soldier with the abundance of nature. This land is well known, but living it while celebrating it attributed it to the unknown. They attributed it to the unknown as any action is attributed to it, but at the will of the speaker, the action is attributed to the unknown.
The unknown soldier is originally a known soldier, then his identity, his actions and his words were built in the unknown. Building towards the unknown is a linguistic question with cultural and conceptual cognitive backgrounds. It is obvious that separatists wonder about the miraculous relationship between the construction of a verb for the unknown and the tale of the unknown soldier that exists in all cultures, including Arab culture.
Separatists always advocate a separation of language issues from reality, mental representations and cultural perceptions. There are many in all cultures who believe that the mind that produced cultural expressions is not very responsible for the way they are spoken, and that linguistic forms remain, no matter how supreme, forms hidden, core issues.
The building lesson for the unknown is a repetitive grammar lesson that meets you at school as a boy searching for the unknown across your path, and you meet while in high school a person who struggles with yourself that you want to be known, and meets you if you choose to study languages ​​whose action is based on the unknown, and you are more assertive or less determined. an active agent when the actor is omitted out of ignorance or to conceal or minimize it. And he told us the simplified lesson that a generation of teachers passed down from a generation of grammarians, that building the unknown is the opposite of building the known. information to say “Amr has multiplied”. In the form, it remains valid in the heart.

The pattern here is the superficial grammatical structure that requires the object to occupy a place from which a basic component of the sentence has fallen, which is the subject, so it is called the displacement of the object of the accusative instead of the nominative in the actor’s name, which requires that he be crowned with the princely nominative sign in the syntactic work, and that he become mayor after having been a virtue. But where did the actor Zaid go? He was known and became unknown because of this deletion. It must be said here that the issue is not formal or tactile, it is a perceptual issue because the speaker who tells us the sentence in which the verb is attributed to the known is telling us something whose elements are complete in terms of attribution, but also in terms of specification. The multiplier is known and so is the multiplier, and it is a perceptual state that appears to us when we calculate the elements of the sentence by invoking and naming them all, as if we were facing an undisguised universe in which nothing is hidden. , and we’ll call this informational thing.

The building lesson for the unknown is a repetitive grammar lesson that meets you at school as a boy searching for the unknown across your path, and you meet while in high school a person who struggles with yourself that you want to be known, and meets you if you choose to study languages ​​whose action is based on the unknown, and you are more assertive or less determined.

Computer science means that the universe is built in a clear structure, so that what is to appear is not hidden there and does not appear more than the listener demands to know. The minimum information is that you respond with the phrase “the beating of Zayd Umar” on one of the three pieces of information: the multiplier, the multiplier and the multiplication. As if the listener knows there is a hitter and a batter and does not know the batter. In this case, complete the incomplete sentence. When the verb is constructed in the unknown, the questions differ, as if it is said (What is Amr crying?), then it is said (Amr was hit), so the attribution to the unknown did not necessarily cover the subject, rather it was based on focusing on Amr the victim, and that the listener when assigned to the unknown gradually sought to build the universe: If the questioner is satisfied with the answer that builds the verb into the unknown, then the anonymity becomes driven by the listener’s desire not to know the topic, but if they ask (who hit Omar) we go back to the three-question strategy that result in the context of computing. Anonymity is a first cognitive state that can lead to computing. There is no intention to conceal the subject, but rather an intention to perceptually focus on the subject.
But suppose Zaid is a soldier fighting for his country, and whether he killed the enemy or wounded him on one of the fronts, he went with part of his forces and led his country to victory , and that soldier went in disguise, sacrifice to a nearby barracks and destroy it, then the sentence (Zayd hit the enemy) would be This is the original sentence that constructs the short story constructively useful from the point of information view. But suppose that Private Zaid kept his name, and this is a condition of the success of the operation, it is said (the enemy was hit); In this case, the case becomes a cover-up and a fear for the life of Zaid, who has not yet returned and does not know if he is on his way back or if he will not return. But what if the soldier was killed in this wound, why did he cover it? We will be faced with many interpretations that relate to the reasons for Zayd’s concealment, and who was concealed by his most important companions? Or are they his family who know about the incident and don’t know who the hero behind it is? Or because the information held by the soldiers and leaders that Private Zaid works with and under their command has not passed through for many reasons, including being busy celebrating victory and forgetting who did it?
Being preoccupied with victory and forgetting its effectiveness, if repeated, will become a culture that will cause us to forget the active subjects in our small victory, and will make us heal oblivion by building the verb of victory into a constructive passive active. in which (the enemy) raises the object to the rank of passive subject; Then he is silent about Zaid, the subject, and he mentions in our sentences based on the accusative the enemy… (Zayd) the subject dies in language and dies in memory and is called unknown..
I walk through the middle of the spring field, excited about my journey among those who know me and know that when I returned to the field as a visitor, I came back victorious over absence, victorious over oblivion, victorious over the attribution which could delete me and construct the verb and with a syntactical conspiracy to one who did not, but rather to one who was affected by the author’s action upon him. But when the blackbird roars at me and it is said Tastra (Ultra ululated for Zaid) .. then I will be victorious, because whoever assigns the action to the unknown will pick me up and make the songbird based on the unknown.

Professor of Linguistics at the Tunisian University

Leave a Comment